Mexican Duck, Anas (platyrhynchos) diazi, at First Dam, Logan, Utah. Copyright Ryan P. O'Donnell. |
First, what is a Mexican Duck? That question is not easy to answer. According to the American Birding Association and the American Ornithologists Union, it is a subspecies of Mallard. But that view is considered by some to be antiquated and inaccurate. Recent genetic work has shown that the Mexican Duck may actually be its own species, and it is at least as unique as several other species such as the Laysan Duck and the Mottled Duck. The picture is complicated, however, because Mallards contain several genetic lineages, and thus to have species boundaries that reflect mitochondrial gene phylogenies, one would either have to split Mallards based on strictly genetics, or else consider "Mallards" to include Laysan Ducks, American Black Ducks, Mottled Ducks, and many others, which obviously does not reflect biology well. This is an area that is in need of additional research, particularly in generating phylogenies and assessing hybridization with nuclear molecular markers.
The definition of species within the Mallard group is confusing, but perhaps even more so in the case of Mexican Ducks, because our understanding of this species is clouded by hybridization with Mallards in Arizona and New Mexico. A classic study of morphology in Mexican Ducks found that there are virtually no pure Mexican Ducks anywhere in the species range, according to a numerical scale of morphology that ranges from pure Mexican Duck to pure Mallard. However, an alternative interpretation of the same dataset is that our definition of what identifies a pure Mexican Duck is too narrow, and that pure Mexican Ducks can show traits that have once been taken to be indicative of Mallards.
With respect to the duck seen recently in Logan, this appears about as close to a pure Mexican Duck as one can expect at the northern part of the range of the (sub)species. There is very little green on the head. The bill is bright yellow. The tail shows no patches of white. The speculum has green iridescence, and is bordered only thinly by white. The rump and undertail coverts match the flanks well in color, showing no obvious indication of the black that a male Mallard has in these areas. The belly is dark, matching the color of the rest of the bird well. The only part that seems to show some obvious Mallard ancestry is that the central retrices (tail feathers) curl up slightly off the plane of the tail, hinting at the curled central tail feathers of an adult male Mallard. But, with how little we know of "pure" Mexican Ducks, perhaps this is not outside the range of variation shown by them? Only an extensive study of morphological variation and nuclear DNA across the range of the Mexican Duck and Mallard can really address this question well.
The Mexican Duck looks a lot like a female Mallard, but darker and (in a male, such as this one) with a bright yellow bill. Copyright Ryan P. O'Donnell. |
feeding park ducks, it is a common practice at this park, and if you happen to time your visit when a local is feeding them, this duck might come right out in the open and fight with the other local domestic breeds for bread. Otherwise, you might get lucky and see it swimming around on the water, or it might be sleeping on the far shore of the lake. If it's not out in the open when you get there, try patiently scanning the sleeping ducks along the shoreline.
Labels: Cache County, identification, Mexican Duck, rare birds, waterfowl
3 Comments:
Great photos and post!
Nice shots Ryan! However I think that this bird shows all the traits for a Mexican x Mallard hybrid. You already touched on the curved black upper tail coverts, but there are a few more traits that suggest some Mallard ancestry in it. The breast has a reddish cast to it which contrasts with the brown sides. The tertials are grayish brown and the tail is pale which also suggest Mallard (these field marks are shown well on the last picture)
To me, the bird looks like a good match for the 2nd duck from the top in Sibley's blog post (http://www.sibleyguides.com/2011/05/intergradation-between-mexican-duck-and-mallard-in-arizona/)
This is a great bird though no matter its parentage. Hopefully I will be able to make it up to see it in person.
Thanks for your comments! I just got a copy of the original paper that studied introgression in these two taxa, and tried scoring this individual using their scoring method. I found many of the characters used for scoring to be vague or subjective, with wiggle room in their definitions. So, I made two calculations, one always interpreting scores with a bias towards the diazi side, and another always biasing my scores towards the platyrhynchos-like scores. The scaling system is designed so that a 0 equals pure platyrhynchos and a 36 equals pure diazi. The scores I got were a 34 and a 26, so I think it's reasonable to assume that the "true" score the author would have given to this bird is somewhere between those. In the author's scale, my 34 qualifies as "pure diazi" and my 26 as "nearer diazi" (27.5 is the cutoff for "very near diazi").
The catch, as I briefly addressed in the blog post, is that NO Mexican Duck populations reach the pure score. In the purest population, the mean score was a 35.2, and in Durango (pretty far south into the species' range in Mexico), the average male score was a 26.4. Either of two phenomenon could explain this: either Mallards have introgressed into all populations of Mexican Ducks, to varying degrees; or the author's definition of what a pure Mexican Duck looks like is too limited, and there is more variation within pure Mexican Ducks than what would score a 36. If the former is the case, then the scale is accurate and this bird shows significant Mallard heritage, as do most Mexican Ducks. If the latter is the case, it would be possible that this could even BE a pure Mexican Duck, but pure Mexican Ducks are not well defined morphologically. I believe the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but no one will really know until a more extensive study is conducted that combines detailed morphological analyses with nuclear genetic analyses.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Back to Previous